House Bill

HB 1033

Various judicial matters.

In plain English

Changes how Marion County's superior court judges are chosen, kept in office, and led. It requires a judicial selection committee to nominate five candidates for each vacancy, and it replaces "presiding judge" with "chief judge." It also gives the executive committee a three-year term and more authority over court decisions, and makes other changes.

Written by AI from the official digest below, and checked only by automated rules. If they differ, the official digest and bill text control.

Official digest

Amends the membership of the community corrections advisory board. Defines "full court" as the total of all Marion superior court judges who are appointed and serving as judges. Specifies that if a newly appointed judge is filling a vacancy of a judge whose term ends the same year as the appointment, the newly appointed judge shall serve a term that expires on December 31 of the sixth full year following the appointment. Requires the Marion County judicial selection committee (judicial selection committee) to nominate five candidates to the governor when a judicial vacancy exists and allows the governor to appoint any of the nominated candidates when filling more than one vacancy. Replaces the term "presiding judge" with "chief judge" within the Marion County superior court. Amends the membership of the judicial selection committee. Prohibits a member of the judicial selection committee who is not an ex officio member to serve consecutive terms and staggers the terms of certain members of the judicial selection committee to begin on July 1, 2026, or July 1, 2028. Requires the judicial selection committee to determine that a judge is suitable to retain judicial office before a judge's request for retention may be placed on the ballot. Establishes a procedure with specific deadlines for a judge who wishes to stand for retention in 2026. Repeals and replaces a provision concerning the procedure to select the Marion County judicial executive committee (executive committee) and certain court provisions. Provides that, for an executive committee starting a term on January 1, 2027, and for the selection of each executive committee thereafter, the full court shall meet not later than November 15 in the final year of the executive committee's term to select the candidates of the next executive committee. Requires a two-thirds vote of the sitting judges who will hold office on January 1 of the next year to select the candidates of the executive committee and requires the chair of the judicial selection committee to approve the members of the executive committee and select one member of the executive committee as the chief judge. Allows the chair of the judicial selection committee to remove a member of the executive committee for cause. Increases the term of an executive committee member of the Marion County judiciary from two years to three years. Specifies which duties are the responsibility of the full court and which are to be determined by a trial judge. Describes the duties and authority of the executive committee. Provides that any action taken by the executive committee may only be overruled by a vote of 85% of the full court sitting at the time the vote is taken. Removes a requirement that the executive committee requires the approval of two-thirds of the judges to determine the number of judicial officers and personnel required to serve the court. Provides that the judge of the circuit court has exclusive authority to appoint commissioners or magistrates allocated to the circuit court. Amends how magistrates and commissioners are appointed. Specifies that the executive committee has final authority for all employment decisions regarding commissioners and magistrates. Repeals a provision that allows the presiding judge to appoint a magistrate and allows the executive committee to appoint 28 magistrates. Requires a voting member of the justice reinvestment advisory council to cast a vote in person. Requires that, in a county having a consolidated city, the chief judge or a judge appointed by the chief judge be the chair of the local justice reinvestment advisory council. Provides that a local or regional advisory council may only take action upon the affirmative vote of the members and a member must cast a vote in person. Makes conforming changes.

Latest action: Signed by the Governor, March 4, 2026Full text and history at iga.in.gov

Authors and sponsors

Danny Lopez, Cyndi Carrasco

Co-authors and co-sponsors: Chris Jeter, Greg Steuerwald

Roll-call votes

4 recorded votes, oldest first. Third-reading votes decide whether a bill passes a chamber; amendment votes and procedural motions are listed too.

House · Jan 20, 2026

Third reading: vote to pass

Roll call text: HB 1033 - Lopez - 3rd Reading

Passed

88 yes2 no10 did not vote

Republicans: 62 yes, 0 no, 7 did not voteDemocrats: 25 yes, 2 no, 3 did not voteIndependents: 1 yes, 0 no

How each member voted

Yes (88)

No (2)

Did not vote (10)

Senate · Feb 23, 2026

Second reading: amendment

Roll call text: HB 1033 - Carrasco - 2nd Reading

Failed

9 yes40 no1 did not vote

Republicans: 0 yes, 40 noDemocrats: 9 yes, 0 no, 1 did not vote

How each member voted

Senate · Feb 24, 2026

Third reading: vote to pass

Roll call text: HB 1033 - Carrasco - 3rd Reading

Passed

39 yes9 no2 did not vote

Republicans: 39 yes, 0 no, 1 did not voteDemocrats: 0 yes, 9 no, 1 did not vote

How each member voted

House · Feb 26, 2026

Final vote: concurrence or conference report

Roll call text: HB 1033 - Lopez

Passed

59 yes27 no14 did not vote

Republicans: 59 yes, 0 no, 10 did not voteDemocrats: 0 yes, 26 no, 4 did not voteIndependents: 0 yes, 1 no

How each member voted

Yes (59)

No (27)

Did not vote (14)

Source: Open States, compiled from the Indiana General Assembly's official roll calls. The official record at iga.in.gov controls. Spot an error? Let us know.