Senate Bill

SB 26

Signal jamming.

In plain English

Allows signal jammers to be seized and makes it a Level 6 felony to knowingly or intentionally make, sell, import, possess, use, or operate one. Raises the offense to a Level 5 felony if a jammer disrupts critical infrastructure or public safety communications, and makes other changes.

Written by AI from the official digest below, and checked only by automated rules. If they differ, the official digest and bill text control.

Official digest

Provides that a signal jammer may be seized. Provides that a person who knowingly or intentionally manufactures, offers for sale, imports, markets, sells, possesses, uses, or operates a signal jammer commits unlawful use of a signal jammer, a Level 6 felony. Provides that the offense is a Level 5 felony if a signal jammer is used to disrupt a component of a critical infrastructure facility or the communications of a public safety agency. Provides, for purposes of criminal statutes regarding offenses involving critical infrastructure, that a communications services facility includes wires and equipment used to provide communications service to a customer.

Latest action: Public Law 183, May 6, 2025Full text and history at iga.in.gov

Authors and sponsors

Jim Tomes, Aaron Freeman, Gary Byrne, Cindy Ledbetter

Co-authors and co-sponsors: Blake Doriot, Jim Buck, Lonnie Randolph, Lorissa Sweet, Shane Lindauer, Matt Pierce

Roll-call votes

4 recorded votes, oldest first. Third-reading votes decide whether a bill passes a chamber; amendment votes and procedural motions are listed too.

Senate · Jan 23, 2025

Third reading: vote to pass

Roll call text: SB 26 - Tomes - 3rd Reading

Passed

49 yes0 no1 did not vote

Republicans: 38 yes, 0 no, 1 did not voteDemocrats: 10 yes, 0 noNot matched to a current member: 1 yes, 0 no

How each member voted

House · Apr 8, 2025

Third reading: vote to pass

Roll call text: SB 26 - Ledbetter - 3rd Reading

Passed

88 yes6 no6 did not vote

Republicans: 60 yes, 5 no, 5 did not voteDemocrats: 26 yes, 1 no, 1 did not voteIndependents: 1 yes, 0 noNot matched to a current member: 1 yes, 0 no

How each member voted

Yes (88)

No (6)

Did not vote (6)

House · Apr 21, 2025

Final vote: concurrence or conference report

Roll call text: SB 26 - Ledbetter

Passed

83 yes8 no9 did not vote

Republicans: 57 yes, 7 no, 6 did not voteDemocrats: 24 yes, 1 no, 3 did not voteIndependents: 1 yes, 0 noNot matched to a current member: 1 yes, 0 no

How each member voted

Yes (83)

No (8)

Did not vote (9)

Senate · Apr 22, 2025

Final vote: concurrence or conference report

Roll call text: SB 26 - Tomes

Passed

48 yes1 no1 did not vote

Republicans: 37 yes, 1 no, 1 did not voteDemocrats: 10 yes, 0 noNot matched to a current member: 1 yes, 0 no

How each member voted

Source: Open States, compiled from the Indiana General Assembly's official roll calls. The official record at iga.in.gov controls. Spot an error? Let us know.